Skip to Content Top

Case Results

  • Successful Outcome in Consumer Fraud Arbitration
    Successfully represented a homeowner in commercial arbitration, securing a favorable ruling on construction and consumer fraud claims.
  • Motion to Quash Defeated in Civil Fraud Matter
    Secured enforcement of subpoena for financial records by successfully defeating a motion to quash in a contested civil fraud matter (NJ Supreme Court)
  • Appellate Success in Construction Litigation
    Successfully defeated an appellate motion in a construction litigation matter, preserving the denial of plaintiff’s summary judgment motion in a payment dispute (NJ State Court)
  • Motion to Dismiss Successful in Trademark Case
    Prevailed on a motion to dismiss in federal court, securing dismissal of several trademark infringement counts for a defendant retailer (E.D.N.Y.).
  • Favorable Copyright Settlement for National Retailer
    Represented a national retailer in federal copyright litigation, obtaining a favorable settlement that upheld the client’s ownership rights (District Court of NJ)
  • Strategic ADA Website Settlement Secured
    Resolved ADA website accessibility claim through strategic settlement for e-commerce retailer (NY State Court)
  • Successfully Defeated Motion to Discharge Lis Pendens in Property Fraud Action
    Prevailed in defeating a motion to discharge lis pendens in a consumer fraud action concerning the fraudulent diversion of funds to a related property (NJ State Court)
  • Successful Resolution of International Copyright Infringement Case
    Successfully resolved an international pre-litigation copyright infringement matter on behalf of a national retailer, resulting in a settlement favorable to the copyright owner.
  • Successfully Opposed Multi-Party Federal Bankruptcy Court Motion To Enforce Automatic Stay Barring State Court Claims
    In a complex, multi-party construction litigation, M. Ross & Associates, LLC successfully defeated the property owner’s motion to enforce the debtor’s automatic stay protection, seeking to prevent our client, a contractor, from pursuing its state law claims against owner. The Court concluded that our client’s claims were separate and apart from the construction lien claims that were barred by the automatic stay. (US Bankruptcy Ct. District of NJ)
1 / 3